The medoid + effect-size gate was meant to buy coverage after run 1 returned
"no separating orbit" for six of fourteen boundaries. It did the opposite:
boundaries with any voting orbit went 8/14 -> 4/14. Requiring cross-side
distance to beat within-side spread is a stricter test, not a better-aimed one.
The error table is seductive and is not evidence: u=0.85 scores median 0.4s,
worst 0.7s — but n=2, and those two boundaries (#8, #10) already had ear
answers. Four survivors cannot validate five candidate fractions, and a metric
computed on the cases that were already easy measures nothing.
The durable finding is the pattern across all three attempts: #13 Vague de
CRIME and #15 REVOLUTION have produced ZERO voting orbits in v2, v3 run 1 and
v3 run 2 — three gates, two estimators. That is not a tuning failure. Those
transitions have no orbit whose timbre differs materially across the switch;
the outgoing and incoming tracks share their sounds, so a timbral lens is
structurally blind there just as an activity lens is blind to a crossfade. A
fourth loosening can only admit noise, because there is no signal in this
feature space.
Declared a dead end in the docstring rather than tuned again. Two ways out are
recorded: change the feature (harmonic/key change, or sample-bank identity from
the score, which differs even when the spectrum does not), or accept #13/#15 as
ear-only calls — two timestamps, seconds of listening each.
Candidates that DID survive are kept in cut_candidates_v3run2.json for #8, #10,
#11, #12 as ear-confirmation inputs, not as boundaries.
